AAPX vs. AFRU

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and AFRU (T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for AFRU.

Performance

AAPX vs. AFRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 22.03% return, which is significantly higher than AFRU's -5.67% return.

AAPX

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: 14.72%
• 6M: 33.22%
• YTD: 22.03%
• 1Y: 92.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFRU

• 1D: 5.14%
• 1M: 56.19%
• 6M: -8.20%
• YTD: -5.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. AFRU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	22.03%	25.59%
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF	-5.67%	-38.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and AFRU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

AAPX vs. AFRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 69
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

AFRU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. AFRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPX	AFRU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.99	—	—

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. AFRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum AFRU drawdown of -84.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and AFRU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPX	AFRU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-84.44%	+25.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-47.57%	+44.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-55.78%	+36.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAPX	AFRU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.28%	121.73%	-73.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.05%	121.73%	-66.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.05%	121.73%	-66.68%

AAPX vs. AFRU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AFRU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPX vs. AFRU - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.55%	0.67%	21.46%
AFRU T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPX and AFRU in my portfolio?

AAPX and AFRU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAPX or AFRU?

On fees, AAPX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPX or AFRU?

AAPX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPX or AFRU?

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.

What is the main difference between AAPX and AFRU?

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 1.50% for AFRU.