PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. AFRU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPX vs. AFRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than AFRU's -38.11% return.


AAPX

1D
-3.52%
1M
24.03%
YTD
21.23%
6M
8.76%
1Y
97.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFRU

1D
-13.32%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
-38.11%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. AFRU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
21.23%24.17%
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
-38.11%-42.30%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and AFRU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. AFRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AFRU
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. AFRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXAFRUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

AAPX vs. AFRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXAFRUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.63

+1.15

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. AFRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum AFRU drawdown of -84.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and AFRU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXAFRUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-84.44%

+25.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-65.60%

+62.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-56.01%

+36.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

Volatility

AAPX vs. AFRU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPXAFRUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.99%

121.30%

-76.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.62%

121.30%

-66.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.62%

121.30%

-66.68%

AAPX vs. AFRU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than AFRU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPX vs. AFRU - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while AFRU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.55%0.67%21.46%
AFRU
T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPX and AFRU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAPX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAPX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AFRU.

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for AFRU.

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 1.50% for AFRU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPX and AFRU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer