AAPW vs. MAGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPW returned 51.64% vs 25.45% for MAGX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MAGX.

Performance

AAPW vs. MAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPW achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than MAGX's -13.73% return.

AAPW

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 8.41%
• 1Y: 51.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGX

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -17.70%
• YTD: -13.73%
• 6M: -16.51%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPW vs. MAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	8.31%	8.71%
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	-13.73%	25.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPW and MAGX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.49

AAPW vs. MAGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAPW	MAGX
Technology	20.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	32.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AAPW vs. MAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 57
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 46

MAGX

MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPW vs. MAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPW	MAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	0.61	+1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	1.06	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.13	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	0.69	+2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	2.03	+5.32

AAPW vs. MAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPW Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the MAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPW and MAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPW vs. MAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, smaller than the maximum MAGX drawdown of -54.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and MAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPW	MAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.28%	-54.19%	+17.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.36%	-37.24%	+19.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.72%	-21.36%	+13.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.97%	-13.79%	+2.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.05%	12.59%	-5.54%

Volatility

AAPW vs. MAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) is 8.10%, while Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a volatility of 15.32%. This indicates that AAPW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPW	MAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	15.32%	-7.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.25%	31.75%	-11.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.73%	41.71%	-13.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.43%	53.76%	-19.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.43%	53.76%	-19.33%

AAPW vs. MAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPW vs. MAGX - Dividend Comparison

AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.36%, more than MAGX's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.36%	28.83%	0.00%
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	2.37%	2.05%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPW and MAGX in my portfolio?

AAPW and MAGX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPW or MAGX?

MAGX has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to AAPW (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPW dropped -36.28% vs MAGX's -54.19%.

Which ETF is better, AAPW or MAGX?

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 51.64% vs 25.45% for MAGX. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AAPW has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPW or MAGX?

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 51.64% return vs 25.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPW or MAGX?

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPW or MAGX?

AAPW has the higher dividend yield at 33.36%, compared with 2.37% for MAGX.

What is the main difference between AAPW and MAGX?

AAPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while MAGX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPW and 0.95% for MAGX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.