AAPW vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

AAPW vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AAPW

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -6.30%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 6M: 6.90%
• 1Y: 51.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 32.39%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPW vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	17.49%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	159.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPW and DRAM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.19

AAPW vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAPW	DRAM
Technology	20.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AAPW vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 61
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 49

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPW vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPW	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.32	—	—

Drawdowns

AAPW vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPW	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.28%	-19.97%	-16.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.43%	-13.37%	+4.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.96%	-3.27%	-7.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAPW	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.75%	92.40%	-64.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.38%	92.40%	-58.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.38%	92.40%	-58.02%

AAPW vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPW vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.62%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	33.62%	28.83%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPW and DRAM in my portfolio?

AAPW and DRAM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAPW or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPW or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPW or DRAM?

AAPW has the higher dividend yield at 33.62%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between AAPW and DRAM?

AAPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPW and 0.65% for DRAM.