AAPR vs. IMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026) and IMAR (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPR returned 9.83% vs 9.00% for IMAR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IMAR.

Performance

AAPR vs. IMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPR achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than IMAR's 1.43% return.

AAPR

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 3.82%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 9.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMAR

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPR vs. IMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026	3.82%	7.79%	6.25%
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	1.43%	18.88%	-2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPR and IMAR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.61

The correlation between AAPR and IMAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAPR vs. IMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPR

AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

IMAR

IMAR Risk / Return Rank: 32
IMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
IMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPR vs. IMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPR	IMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.18	1.13	+3.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	7.21	1.65	+5.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.24	+0.75
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.12	1.31	+10.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	62.99	5.06	+57.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAPR vs. IMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is higher than the IMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPR and IMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPR	IMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18	1.13	+3.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.73	0.89	+0.84

Drawdowns

AAPR vs. IMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPR drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum IMAR drawdown of -9.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPR and IMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPR	IMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-9.05%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.81%	-6.91%	+6.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.77%	+0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-1.89%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.16%	1.78%	-1.62%

Volatility

AAPR vs. IMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) is 0.68%, while Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that AAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPR	IMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	2.92%	-2.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	6.89%	-5.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36%	7.98%	-5.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.81%	9.35%	-4.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.81%	9.35%	-4.54%

AAPR vs. IMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPR vs. IMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAPR nor IMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPR and IMAR in my portfolio?

AAPR and IMAR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPR or IMAR?

IMAR has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPR dropped -5.99% vs IMAR's -9.05%.

Which ETF is better, AAPR or IMAR?

On 1-year performance, AAPR leads with 9.83% vs 9.00% for IMAR. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPR or IMAR?

Over the 1-year period, AAPR has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPR or IMAR?

AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPR or IMAR?

AAPR and IMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AAPR and IMAR?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AAPR and 0.85% for IMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.