IMAR vs. JULQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IMAR (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March) and JULQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. IMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for JULQ.

Performance

IMAR vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IMAR

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IMAR vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IMAR Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March	0.00%
JULQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July	0.00%

Return for Risk

IMAR vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAR

IMAR Risk / Return Rank: 32
IMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
IMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
IMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
IMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
IMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAR vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IMAR	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IMAR	JULQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	—	—

Drawdowns

IMAR vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.05%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAR and JULQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IMAR	JULQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	0.00%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	0.00%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.89%	0.00%	-1.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IMAR	JULQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.98%	0.00%	+7.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.35%	0.00%	+9.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.35%	0.00%	+9.35%

IMAR vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

IMAR vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAR nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IMAR or JULQ?

On fees, JULQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IMAR or JULQ?

JULQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IMAR or JULQ?

IMAR and JULQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IMAR and JULQ?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IMAR and 0.79% for JULQ.