PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IMAR vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IMAR vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IMAR vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


IMAR

1D
2.11%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
-2.81%
6M
0.16%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMAR vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IMAR vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IMAR
IMAR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IMAR vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - March (IMAR) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMARHOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.32

IMAR vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IMARHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

Dividends

IMAR vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IMAR nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IMAR vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.05%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMAR and HOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IMARHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

0.00%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.91%

0.00%

-4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.90%

0.00%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

Volatility

IMAR vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IMARHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.31%

0.00%

+9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.21%

0.00%

+9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.21%

0.00%

+9.21%