PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed T with an annualized return of 30.70%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-2.14%
1M
9.59%
6M
28.05%
YTD
20.35%
1Y
55.26%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
30.70%
ALL TIME*
19.46%

T

1D
0.64%
1M
2.62%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
-7.04%
1Y
-13.37%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
2.10%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
20.35%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
T
AT&T Inc.
-7.04%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and T is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.20

The correlation between AAPL and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAPL:

$4.80T

T:

$152.52B

EPS

AAPL:

$8.25

T:

$3.05

PE Ratio

AAPL:

39.60

T:

7.19

PEG Ratio

AAPL:

5.21

T:

0.30

PS Ratio

AAPL:

10.75

T:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL:

$451.44B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL:

$216.07B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAPL:

$153.63B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.92

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

-0.46

+4.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

-1.03

+10.62

AAPL vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-64.15%

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-28.89%

+15.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-28.89%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-32.01%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-42.35%

+3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-21.57%

+19.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.54%

-15.74%

-13.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.78%

12.94%

-7.16%

Volatility

AAPL vs. T - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

9.59%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

19.91%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

23.72%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.79%

24.38%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.08%

23.92%

+5.16%

Dividends

AAPL vs. T - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than T's 6.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.32%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
T
AT&T Inc.
6.58%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

AAPL vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
111.18B
33.47B
(AAPL) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and T have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs T's -64.15%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer