PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed T with an annualized return of 29.36%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and T is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984

0.20

The correlation between AAPL and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

AAPL:

$8.24

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

AAPL:

35.35

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

AAPL:

4.65

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

AAPL:

9.60

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL:

$451.44B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL:

$216.07B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAPL:

$153.63B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.92

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

-0.59

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

-1.22

+9.69

AAPL vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-64.15%

-17.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-21.87%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-21.87%

-11.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-32.01%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-42.35%

+3.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-18.12%

+10.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.59%

-15.72%

-13.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

10.64%

-5.11%

Volatility

AAPL vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

8.21%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

17.80%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

22.13%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

24.01%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

23.73%

+5.19%

Dividends

AAPL vs. T - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

AAPL vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00B20222023202420252026
111.18B
33.47B
(AAPL) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and T have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs T's -64.15%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer