AAPL vs. PH
AAPL (Apple Inc) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. AAPL operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 30.70%/yr vs 25.62%/yr for PH. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 8.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed PH with an annualized return of 30.70%, while PH has yielded a comparatively lower 25.62% annualized return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 55.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- 30.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.46%
PH
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 32.73%
- 3Y*
- 35.16%
- 5Y*
- 27.15%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
AAPL vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 20.35% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 8.62% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and PH is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.29 |
The correlation between AAPL and PH shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AAPL:
$4.80T
PH:
$119.88B
AAPL:
$8.25
PH:
$27.15
AAPL:
39.60
PH:
35.02
AAPL:
5.21
PH:
1.48
AAPL:
10.75
PH:
5.81
AAPL:
45.29
PH:
7.82
AAPL:
$451.44B
PH:
$20.99B
AAPL:
$216.07B
PH:
$7.81B
AAPL:
$153.63B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
PH
AAPL vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.23 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 1.70 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 4.83 | +4.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than PH's maximum drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -66.92% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -19.34% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -26.79% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -28.64% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -54.68% | +16.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -6.85% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.54% | -15.31% | -14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 6.80% | -1.02% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 6.33%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | 6.33% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 19.36% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 25.42% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 28.61% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.08% | 31.61% | -2.53% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than PH's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.78% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
AAPL vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AAPL vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
AAPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
AAPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
AAPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and PH have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to PH (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs PH's -66.92%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer