PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. NVDG.F
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AAPL is traded in USD, while NVDG.F is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NVDG.F values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG.F's 13.45% return.


AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%

NVDG.F

1D
-2.74%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
13.45%
6M
17.63%
1Y
41.10%
3Y*
68.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-20.03%
NVDG.F
NVIDIA Corporation CDR
13.45%35.40%159.49%239.31%-40.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and NVDG.F is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022

0.15

The correlation between AAPL and NVDG.F shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. NVDG.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG.F
NVDG.F Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG.F Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLNVDG.FDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.22

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

5.19

+3.28

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and NVDG.F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than NVDG.F's maximum drawdown of -64.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and NVDG.F.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLNVDG.FDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-64.73%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-20.95%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-39.19%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-10.91%

+3.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.59%

-16.94%

-12.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

8.99%

-3.46%

Volatility

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLNVDG.FDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

12.52%

-5.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

29.29%

-12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

43.26%

-20.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

62.45%

-34.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

62.45%

-33.53%

Dividends

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than NVDG.F's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
NVDG.F
NVIDIA Corporation CDR
0.11%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AAPL vs. NVDG.F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and NVIDIA Corporation CDR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AAPL values in USD, NVDG.F values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and NVDG.F have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and NVDG.F

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer