PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 26.30% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 29.15%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-0.72%
1M
-9.72%
YTD
3.83%
6M
3.11%
1Y
40.67%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
29.15%

JNJ

1D
1.51%
1M
14.73%
YTD
26.30%
6M
25.93%
1Y
73.85%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
3.83%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
26.30%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and JNJ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1980

0.21

The correlation between AAPL and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAPL:

$4.16T

JNJ:

$632.11B

EPS

AAPL:

$8.25

JNJ:

$8.63

PE Ratio

AAPL:

34.16

JNJ:

29.95

PEG Ratio

AAPL:

4.49

JNJ:

1.00

PS Ratio

AAPL:

9.27

JNJ:

6.54

PB Ratio

AAPL:

39.07

JNJ:

7.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAPL:

$451.44B

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAPL:

$216.07B

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAPL:

$153.63B

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.74

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

6.77

-3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

19.70

-12.60

AAPL vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-50.67%

-31.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-10.96%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-15.95%

-17.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-18.41%

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-27.37%

-11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

0.00%

-10.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.58%

-11.89%

-17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

3.76%

+1.99%

Volatility

AAPL vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 7.91%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

7.91%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

13.30%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

17.92%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.69%

17.11%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.00%

18.58%

+10.42%

Dividends

AAPL vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than JNJ's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.37%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.03%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

AAPL vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple Inc and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B140.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
111.18B
24.06B
(AAPL) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AAPL vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Apple Inc and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
49.3%
71.5%
Portfolio components
AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and JNJ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to JNJ (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer