AAPL vs. GDGB.L
AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock, while GDGB.L (VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Over the past 5 years, AAPL returned 18.59%/yr vs 17.20%/yr for GDGB.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL vs. GDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AAPL is traded in USD, while GDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than GDGB.L's -7.35% return.
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.36%
GDGB.L
- 1D
- 5.31%
- 1M
- -17.51%
- YTD
- -7.35%
- 6M
- -5.86%
- 1Y
- 49.71%
- 3Y*
- 38.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL vs. GDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 7.29% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 16.31% |
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | -7.35% | 156.24% | 9.38% | 9.16% | -7.97% | -11.28% | 23.23% | 44.43% | -10.42% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL and GDGB.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL vs. GDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL
GDGB.L
AAPL vs. GDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL | GDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 1.41 | +2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 3.89 | +4.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL vs. GDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than GDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and GDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL | GDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.80% | -50.68% | -31.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -35.18% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.36% | -35.18% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.36% | -46.27% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -31.02% | +23.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.59% | -17.81% | -11.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 12.73% | -7.20% |
Volatility
AAPL vs. GDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) has a volatility of 14.95%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL | GDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 14.95% | -8.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 36.15% | -19.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.64% | 44.61% | -21.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 35.73% | -8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.92% | 34.29% | -5.37% |
Dividends
AAPL vs. GDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while GDGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL and GDGB.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AAPL and GDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer