AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX
AAPL.TO (Apple CDR (CAD Hedged)) is a stock, while GFFFX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Funds. Over the past 3 years, AAPL.TO returned 15.35%/yr vs 26.17%/yr for GFFFX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AAPL.TO is traded in CAD, while GFFFX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFFFX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAPL.TO having a 12.56% return and GFFFX slightly higher at 13.11%.
AAPL.TO
- 1D
- 6.78%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 42.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFFFX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- YTD
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.28%
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) | 12.56% | 6.36% | 29.57% | 46.85% | -14.83% |
GFFFX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 | 13.11% | 14.48% | 39.15% | 34.24% | -1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL.TO and GFFFX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022 | 0.49 |
The correlation between AAPL.TO and GFFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL.TO
GFFFX
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPL.TO | GFFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.80 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 6.00 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.28%, roughly equal to the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL.TO and GFFFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL.TO | GFFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.28% | -33.46% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -13.83% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.28% | -22.40% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -0.46% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -4.93% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 4.13% | +1.91% |
Volatility
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison
Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.42% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 (GFFFX) at 7.42%. This indicates that AAPL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL.TO | GFFFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.42% | 7.42% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.18% | 13.51% | +5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 16.66% | +8.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.59% | 21.23% | +6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.59% | 20.73% | +6.86% |
Dividends
AAPL.TO vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison
AAPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than GFFFX's 10.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFFFX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class F-2 | 10.04% | 10.95% | 9.23% | 7.64% | 4.32% | 8.42% | 4.51% | 7.38% | 12.29% | 7.27% | 6.87% | 9.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL.TO and GFFFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AAPL.TO and GFFFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer