AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO
AAPL.TO (Apple CDR (CAD Hedged)) and GOOG.TO (Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged)) are both stocks. AAPL.TO operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology), while GOOG.TO operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, AAPL.TO returned 17.57%/yr vs 40.47%/yr for GOOG.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL.TO achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG.TO's 16.59% return.
AAPL.TO
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 52.21%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOG.TO
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 112.62%
- 3Y*
- 40.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) | 13.62% | 6.36% | 29.57% | 46.85% | -27.69% | 19.43% |
GOOG.TO Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) | 16.59% | 61.01% | 33.55% | 56.62% | -39.75% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL.TO
GOOG.TO
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) and Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) (GOOG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPL.TO | GOOG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.63 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 5.42 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 19.31 | -10.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPL.TO | GOOG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 3.97 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.67 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.28%, smaller than the maximum GOOG.TO drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL.TO | GOOG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.28% | -45.34% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -21.03% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.28% | -29.62% | -3.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -7.56% | +6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.59% | -14.14% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 5.89% | -0.16% |
Volatility
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) is 5.40%, while Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) (GOOG.TO) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that AAPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL.TO | GOOG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 9.03% | -3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 20.35% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.22% | 28.72% | -5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.98% | 31.29% | -3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.98% | 31.29% | -3.31% |
Dividends
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Dividend Comparison
AAPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than GOOG.TO's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.12% |
GOOG.TO Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) and Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer