PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) and Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) (GOOG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL.TO achieves a 13.62% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG.TO's 16.59% return.


AAPL.TO

1D
0.34%
1M
7.96%
YTD
13.62%
6M
10.60%
1Y
52.21%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
10Y*

GOOG.TO

1D
3.54%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
16.59%
6M
13.36%
1Y
112.62%
3Y*
40.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AAPL.TO
Apple CDR (CAD Hedged)
13.62%6.36%29.57%46.85%-27.69%19.43%
GOOG.TO
Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged)
16.59%61.01%33.55%56.62%-39.75%0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL.TO
AAPL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAPL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG.TO
GOOG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) and Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) (GOOG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPL.TOGOOG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.63

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

5.42

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

19.31

-10.52

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the GOOG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPL.TOGOOG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.97

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.67

-0.11

Drawdowns

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.28%, smaller than the maximum GOOG.TO drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPL.TOGOOG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.28%

-45.34%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.30%

-21.03%

+6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.28%

-29.62%

-3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-7.56%

+6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-14.14%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

5.89%

-0.16%

Volatility

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) is 5.40%, while Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged) (GOOG.TO) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that AAPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPL.TOGOOG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

9.03%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

20.35%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.22%

28.72%

-5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.98%

31.29%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.98%

31.29%

-3.31%

Dividends

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Dividend Comparison

AAPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than GOOG.TO's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AAPL.TO
Apple CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.34%0.38%0.85%0.49%0.70%0.12%
GOOG.TO
Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged)
0.23%0.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AAPL.TO vs. GOOG.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) and Alphabet CDR (CAD Hedged). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


(AAPL.TO) Total Revenue
(GOOG.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL.TO and GOOG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer