AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO).
HHIS.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jan 16, 2025.
Performance
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) | -6.24% | 16.98% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | -10.04% | 24.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPL.TO achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly higher than HHIS.TO's -10.04% return.
AAPL.TO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIS.TO
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -11.96%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AAPL.TO
HHIS.TO
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) and Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPL.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.90 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.48 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.19 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.74 | 3.17 | -1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPL.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.90 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.28 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPL.TO and HHIS.TO is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Dividend Comparison
AAPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than HHIS.TO's 30.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL.TO Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.12% |
HHIS.TO Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF | 30.49% | 22.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.28%, roughly equal to the maximum HHIS.TO drawdown of -31.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL.TO and HHIS.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPL.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.28% | -31.83% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.58% | -24.43% | +1.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.07% | -18.95% | +7.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -8.79% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.65% | 9.16% | -1.51% |
Volatility
AAPL.TO vs. HHIS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Apple CDR (CAD Hedged) (AAPL.TO) is 5.80%, while Harvest Diversified High Income Shares ETF (HHIS.TO) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that AAPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HHIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAPL.TO | HHIS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 9.58% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.22% | 19.38% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.90% | 32.59% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 35.37% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 35.37% | -7.22% |