AAPD vs. MSFD
AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -16.55%/yr vs -13.24%/yr for MSFD. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 1.06% expense ratio.
Performance
AAPD vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's -7.52% return.
AAPD
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -13.97%
- YTD
- -13.18%
- 1Y
- -34.80%
- 3Y*
- -16.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.73%
MSFD
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -22.84%
- 6M
- -20.60%
- YTD
- -7.52%
- 1Y
- 3.24%
- 3Y*
- -13.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -16.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.85M | $121.65M | $106.46M | |
| $29.52M | $18.70M | $21.49M |
AAPD vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | -13.18% | -11.41% | -21.45% | -30.42% | 14.12% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | -7.52% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPD and MSFD is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AAPD and MSFD has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPD vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
AAPD
MSFD
AAPD vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.05 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.11 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 0.39 | -1.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPD vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.02% | -59.90% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.60% | -30.84% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.16% | -40.50% | -12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.53% | -58.29% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -41.76% | +6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.30% | 8.33% | +16.97% |
Volatility
AAPD vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) is 10.59%, while Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a volatility of 18.39%. This indicates that AAPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 18.39% | -7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 28.21% | -7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.84% | 32.11% | -6.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 27.63% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 27.63% | -0.18% |
AAPD vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AAPD and MSFD have an expense ratio of 1.06%.
Dividends
AAPD vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than MSFD's 4.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | 3.52% | 3.60% | 4.55% | 4.37% | 0.53% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 4.27% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPD and MSFD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFD has higher volatility (18.39%) compared to AAPD (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -63.02% vs MSFD's -59.90%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -13.24% vs -16.55% for AAPD. Both ETFs have the same 1.06% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPD has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -13.24% return vs -16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPD and MSFD have the same expense ratio: 1.06% per year.
MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.52% for AAPD.
AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%).
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPD and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer