AAPD vs. EFZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ).
AAPD and EFZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAPD is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Apple Inc. (-100%). It was launched on Aug 8, 2022. EFZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). It was launched on Oct 23, 2007. Both AAPD and EFZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AAPD vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAPD vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | 7.12% | -11.41% | -21.45% | -30.42% | 21.49% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -0.56% | -20.92% | 2.90% | -10.38% | -1.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a 7.12% return, which is significantly higher than EFZ's -0.56% return.
AAPD
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 7.12%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- -15.69%
- 3Y*
- -13.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFZ
- 1D
- -3.23%
- 1M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- -16.07%
- 3Y*
- -7.87%
- 5Y*
- -5.38%
- 10Y*
- -8.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAPD vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than EFZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAPD vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank
AAPD
EFZ
AAPD vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | -0.87 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | -1.19 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.85 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.50 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | -0.72 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.87 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | -0.33 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPD and EFZ is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AAPD vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison
AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, less than EFZ's 3.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | 3.14% | 3.60% | 4.55% | 4.37% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 3.78% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
AAPD vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -55.92%, smaller than the maximum EFZ drawdown of -88.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and EFZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.92% | -88.08% | +32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.16% | -30.95% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.07% | -86.98% | +36.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.18% | -66.89% | +33.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.76% | 21.44% | +8.32% |
Volatility
AAPD vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) is 5.62%, while ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) has a volatility of 8.44%. This indicates that AAPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAPD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 8.44% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | 12.30% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.58% | 18.50% | +13.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 16.54% | +10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 17.31% | +9.89% |