AAPD vs. EFZ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) are both Inverse Equities funds - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while EFZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -15.75%/yr vs -9.08%/yr for EFZ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EFZ.

Performance

AAPD vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -14.80% return, which is significantly lower than EFZ's -7.54% return.

AAPD

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -8.69%
• 6M: -18.47%
• YTD: -14.80%
• 1Y: -33.43%
• 3Y*: -15.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFZ

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: -4.41%
• YTD: -7.54%
• 1Y: -13.80%
• 3Y*: -9.08%
• 5Y*: -5.66%
• 10Y*: -8.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPD vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	-14.80%	-11.41%	-21.45%	-30.42%	20.24%
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE	-7.54%	-20.92%	2.90%	-10.38%	-1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPD and EFZ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.44

Return for Risk

AAPD vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPD

AAPD Risk / Return Rank: 1
AAPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
AAPD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EFZ

EFZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
EFZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EFZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EFZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EFZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EFZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPD vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPD	EFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.40	-0.82	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.05	-1.10	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	0.87	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	-0.79	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	-1.29	-0.13

AAPD vs. EFZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPD Sharpe Ratio is -1.40, which is lower than the EFZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPD and EFZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPD vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -60.28%, smaller than the maximum EFZ drawdown of -88.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and EFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPD	EFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.28%	-88.15%	+27.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.31%	-17.60%	-18.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.69%	-35.82%	-13.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.28%	-87.89%	+27.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-67.18%	+32.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.53%	10.71%	+12.82%

Volatility

AAPD vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) at 4.97%. This indicates that AAPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPD	EFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	4.97%	+4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.60%	14.26%	+4.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.00%	16.89%	+7.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.17%	16.84%	+10.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.17%	17.11%	+10.06%

AAPD vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than EFZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPD vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison

AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than EFZ's 3.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	3.59%	3.60%	4.55%	4.37%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE	3.96%	4.55%	5.29%	4.66%	0.57%	0.00%	0.04%	1.56%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPD and EFZ in my portfolio?

AAPD and EFZ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPD or EFZ?

AAPD has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to EFZ (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -60.28% vs EFZ's -88.15%.

Which ETF is better, AAPD or EFZ?

On 3-year performance, EFZ leads with -9.08% vs -15.75% for AAPD. On fees, EFZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EFZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPD or EFZ?

Over the 3-year period, EFZ has performed better with a -9.08% return vs -15.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPD or EFZ?

EFZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPD or EFZ?

EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.59% for AAPD.

What is the main difference between AAPD and EFZ?

AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while EFZ tracks MSCI EAFE Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 0.95% for EFZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.