AAPD vs. DOG
AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -16.24%/yr vs -8.28%/yr for DOG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAPD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
AAPD vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -12.45% return, which is significantly lower than DOG's -4.15% return.
AAPD
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- -12.45%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- -33.84%
- 3Y*
- -16.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
AAPD vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | -12.45% | -11.41% | -21.45% | -30.42% | 21.49% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.15% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPD and DOG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AAPD and DOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPD vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
AAPD
DOG
AAPD vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | -1.05 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | -1.42 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.84 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | -0.87 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | -1.43 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.52 | -1.05 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.57 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
AAPD vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -59.79%, smaller than the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.79% | -92.69% | +32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.37% | -14.63% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.07% | -28.77% | -20.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.19% | -92.61% | +33.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -66.39% | +32.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.16% | 8.89% | +14.27% |
Volatility
AAPD vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 2.98%. This indicates that AAPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPD | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 2.98% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 9.37% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 12.13% | +10.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 14.79% | +12.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 17.49% | +9.53% |
AAPD vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPD vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than DOG's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | 3.84% | 3.60% | 4.55% | 4.37% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.49% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPD and DOG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPD has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -59.79% vs DOG's -92.69%.
On 3-year performance, DOG leads with -8.28% vs -16.24% for AAPD. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DOG has performed better with a -8.28% return vs -16.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.
AAPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 3.49% for DOG.
AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 0.95% for DOG.
DOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.05 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPD and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer