AAPD vs. DOG

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -16.55%/yr vs -9.29%/yr for DOG. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.

Performance

AAPD vs. DOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly lower than DOG's -9.55% return.

AAPD

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: -13.97%
• YTD: -13.18%
• 1Y: -34.80%
• 3Y*: -16.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.73%

DOG

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -2.01%
• 6M: -7.74%
• YTD: -9.55%
• 1Y: -15.27%
• 3Y*: -9.29%
• 5Y*: -6.15%
• 10Y*: -11.28%
• ALL TIME*: -10.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	$133.85M	$121.65M	$106.46M
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	$44.96M	$38.77M	$42.13M

AAPD vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	-13.18%	-11.41%	-21.45%	-30.42%	20.24%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	-9.55%	-8.40%	-5.62%	-7.05%	-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPD and DOG is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.49

Return for Risk

AAPD vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPD

AAPD Risk / Return Rank: 1
AAPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
AAPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

DOG

DOG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPD vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPD	DOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.35	-1.22	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	-1.67	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	0.81	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.97	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	-1.90	+0.52

AAPD vs. DOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPD Sharpe Ratio is -1.35, which is comparable to the DOG Sharpe Ratio of -1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPD and DOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPD vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, smaller than the maximum DOG drawdown of -93.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and DOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPD	DOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.02%	-93.02%	+30.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.60%	-15.77%	-24.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.16%	-32.03%	-21.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.53%	-93.02%	+33.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-66.60%	+31.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.30%	8.04%	+17.26%

Volatility

AAPD vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) at 4.20%. This indicates that AAPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPD	DOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	4.20%	+6.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.23%	10.11%	+10.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.84%	12.66%	+13.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.45%	14.86%	+12.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.45%	17.51%	+9.94%

AAPD vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPD vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison

AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, which matches DOG's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	3.52%	3.60%	4.55%	4.37%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	3.49%	3.65%	5.72%	4.54%	0.41%	0.00%	0.14%	1.54%	0.86%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPD and DOG in my portfolio?

AAPD and DOG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPD or DOG?

AAPD has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to DOG (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -63.02% vs DOG's -93.02%.

Which ETF is better, AAPD or DOG?

On 3-year performance, DOG leads with -9.29% vs -16.55% for AAPD. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPD or DOG?

Over the 3-year period, DOG has performed better with a -9.29% return vs -16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPD or DOG?

DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPD or DOG?

AAPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.49% for DOG.

What is the main difference between AAPD and DOG?

AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 0.95% for DOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.22 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.