AAPB vs. TSMX
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPB returned 106.72% vs 295.18% for TSMX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
AAPB vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 85.80% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 106.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 85.80%
- 6M
- 94.81%
- 1Y
- 295.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 23.70% | -0.93% | 20.22% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 85.80% | 81.48% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and TSMX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.25 |
AAPB vs. TSMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPB
TSMX
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AAPB
TSMX
Basic Materials
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Communication Services
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Defensive
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Energy
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Financial Services
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Healthcare
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Industrials
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Real Estate
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Utilities
AAPB
-
TSMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
TSMX
AAPB vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPB | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 8.51 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 27.80 | -18.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPB | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 4.15 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 1.57 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum TSMX drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -63.80% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -34.93% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -4.27% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -15.85% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 10.68% | +0.96% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 11.20%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) has a volatility of 22.91%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 22.91% | -11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.96% | 54.45% | -22.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.82% | 71.63% | -26.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 80.93% | -29.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 80.93% | -29.60% |
AAPB vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than TSMX's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.55% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.44% | 8.01% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and TSMX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMX has higher volatility (22.91%) compared to AAPB (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs TSMX's -63.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 295.18% vs 106.72% for AAPB. On fees, TSMX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 11.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 295.18% return vs 106.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 3.55% for AAPB.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer