AAPB vs. MVLL
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. AAPB is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPB returned 106.72% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
AAPB vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 23.70% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- 24.81%
- YTD
- 23.70%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 106.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPB vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 23.70% | 11.52% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | -10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and MVLL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025 | 0.33 |
AAPB vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAPB
MVLL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AAPB
MVLL
Basic Materials
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Communication Services
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Defensive
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Energy
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Financial Services
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Healthcare
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Industrials
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Real Estate
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Utilities
AAPB
-
MVLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
MVLL
AAPB vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPB | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.63 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 25.11 | -21.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 52.27 | -43.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPB | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 9.23 | -6.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 3.33 | -2.95 |
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, roughly equal to the maximum MVLL drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -59.02% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -48.93% | +20.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | 0.00% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -22.42% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.64% | 23.46% | -11.82% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 11.20%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 60.78% | -49.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.96% | 96.08% | -64.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.82% | 133.11% | -88.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 139.63% | -88.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 139.63% | -88.30% |
AAPB vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.55% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and MVLL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to AAPB (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs MVLL's -59.02%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 106.72% for AAPB. On fees, AAPB is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 11.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 106.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AAPB is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
AAPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.
Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 1.50% for MVLL.
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer