PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPB vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPB vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -13.70% return.


AAPB

1D
3.36%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
12.10%
6M
10.03%
1Y
101.75%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
10Y*

MSTR

1D
5.78%
1M
-26.08%
YTD
-13.70%
6M
-19.09%
1Y
-65.75%
3Y*
64.73%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
22.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPB vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
12.10%-0.93%47.02%77.21%-38.60%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-13.70%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-57.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPB and MSTR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPB vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPB
AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPB vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPBMSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.83

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

-0.86

+4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

-1.24

+9.91

AAPB vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPB Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPB and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPB vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPBMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.13%

-99.86%

+41.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.11%

-76.53%

+48.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.13%

-77.42%

+19.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.37%

-72.32%

+59.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-86.45%

+67.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.77%

53.20%

-41.43%

Volatility

AAPB vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) is 14.34%, while Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a volatility of 21.84%. This indicates that AAPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPBMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.34%

21.84%

-7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.42%

57.65%

-24.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.58%

71.53%

-25.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.37%

90.56%

-39.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.37%

73.85%

-22.48%

Dividends

AAPB vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
3.92%4.39%0.00%18.75%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPB and MSTR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to AAPB (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPB and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer