AAPB vs. DBC
AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPB is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. AAPB is actively managed, while DBC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPB returned 22.43%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for DBC. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPB charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
AAPB vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPB achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.37% return.
AAPB
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- YTD
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 106.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.48%
DBC
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 27.37%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.04M | $3.86M | $2.72M | |
| $29.84M | $30.72M | $31.47M |
AAPB vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 19.97% | -0.93% | 47.02% | 77.21% | -38.60% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 27.37% | 8.10% | 2.18% | -6.19% | -1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPB and DBC is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between AAPB and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPB vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
AAPB
DBC
AAPB vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPB | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.12 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 6.91 | +1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPB vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPB drawdown since its inception was -58.13%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPB and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPB | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.13% | -76.36% | +18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.11% | -16.54% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.13% | -16.54% | -41.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.88% | -26.32% | +9.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -46.06% | +27.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.43% | 5.07% | +7.36% |
Volatility
AAPB vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) has a higher volatility of 22.37% compared to Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) at 7.61%. This indicates that AAPB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPB | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.37% | 7.61% | +14.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.34% | 16.61% | +25.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.48% | 19.70% | +32.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.51% | 19.33% | +33.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.51% | 17.89% | +34.62% |
AAPB vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPB has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPB vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
AAPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than DBC's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF | 3.66% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 18.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPB and DBC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPB has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to DBC (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPB dropped -58.13% vs DBC's -76.36%.
On 3-year performance, AAPB leads with 22.43% vs 9.99% for DBC. On fees, DBC is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DBC has been the lower-risk option at 7.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 22.43% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBC is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AAPB.
AAPB has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.61% for DBC.
AAPB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AAPB and 0.85% for DBC.
AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPB and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer