PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAOTX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAOTX achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 4.24% return.


AAOTX

1D
1.83%
1M
-1.77%
6M
5.39%
YTD
8.28%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.52%

FFFCX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.72%
6M
2.71%
YTD
4.24%
1Y
8.85%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
5.49%
ALL TIME*
6.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AAOTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A
8.28%20.36%15.20%21.16%-19.94%16.85%46.68%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.24%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%20.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AAOTX and FFFCX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.84

The correlation between AAOTX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAOTX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAOTX
AAOTX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AAOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AAOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAOTXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.26

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

9.16

-1.89

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAOTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAOTX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAOTX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAOTX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAOTXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.57%

-36.88%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-4.00%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-4.77%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-18.35%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-1.23%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-4.55%

-1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

0.98%

+1.31%

Volatility

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 1.76%. This indicates that AAOTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAOTXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

1.76%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

4.92%

+6.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

5.60%

+7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

6.49%

+8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

6.27%

+8.83%

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAOTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAOTX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

AAOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than FFFCX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAOTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A
4.07%4.41%2.52%1.71%3.67%1.34%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.70%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAOTX and FFFCX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAOTX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FFFCX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAOTX dropped -27.57% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAOTX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer