PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAF.L vs. CBG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Airtel Africa plc (AAF.L) and Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAF.L achieves a -5.41% return, which is significantly higher than CBG.L's -13.65% return.


AAF.L

1D
0.42%
1M
-4.87%
YTD
-5.41%
6M
5.46%
1Y
86.51%
3Y*
43.84%
5Y*
37.21%
10Y*

CBG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.17%
YTD
-13.65%
6M
1.39%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
-21.01%
5Y*
-19.92%
10Y*
-6.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AAF.L
Airtel Africa plc
-5.41%218.32%-9.69%20.11%-14.00%81.14%-1.32%21.03%
CBG.L
Close Brothers Group plc
-13.65%121.21%-70.25%-17.80%-20.21%5.65%-10.18%16.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AAF.L and CBG.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.25

The correlation between AAF.L and CBG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAF.L:

£12.25B

CBG.L:

£675.00M

EPS

AAF.L:

£0.18

CBG.L:

-£0.82

PS Ratio

AAF.L:

1.92

CBG.L:

0.37

PB Ratio

AAF.L:

3.89

CBG.L:

0.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAF.L:

£6.37B

CBG.L:

£1.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAF.L:

£3.93B

CBG.L:

£1.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

AAF.L:

£2.98B

CBG.L:

£174.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAF.L vs. CBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAF.L
AAF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CBG.L
CBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airtel Africa plc (AAF.L) and Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAF.LCBG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

0.71

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

1.43

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.18

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.03

+2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.92

2.42

+10.50

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the CBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAF.L and CBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAF.LCBG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.71

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

-0.41

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.21

+0.43

Drawdowns

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAF.L drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, smaller than the maximum CBG.L drawdown of -86.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAF.L and CBG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAF.LCBG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.78%

-86.76%

+20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.56%

-37.33%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.08%

-79.97%

+48.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.52%

-86.55%

+42.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.04%

-67.71%

+47.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.26%

-22.65%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.64%

15.84%

-9.20%

Volatility

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Volatility Comparison

Airtel Africa plc (AAF.L) has a higher volatility of 26.01% compared to Close Brothers Group plc (CBG.L) at 12.26%. This indicates that AAF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAF.LCBG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.01%

12.26%

+13.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.44%

34.38%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.79%

51.76%

-9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.44%

48.98%

-13.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.24%

40.24%

+6.00%

Dividends

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Dividend Comparison

AAF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while CBG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAF.L
Airtel Africa plc
1.13%1.07%3.31%2.76%3.21%1.80%3.71%2.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CBG.L
Close Brothers Group plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%8.50%6.30%4.27%2.89%4.13%4.38%4.14%3.94%4.00%

Financials

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airtel Africa plc and Close Brothers Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.71B
358.00M
(AAF.L) Total Revenue
(CBG.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

AAF.L vs. CBG.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Airtel Africa plc and Close Brothers Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
51.5%
21.9%
Portfolio components
AAF.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airtel Africa plc reported a gross profit of 880.79M and revenue of 1.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.5%.

CBG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a gross profit of 78.50M and revenue of 358.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

AAF.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airtel Africa plc reported an operating income of 578.39M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.8%.

CBG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported an operating income of -65.50M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.

AAF.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airtel Africa plc reported a net income of 194.75M and revenue of 1.71B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

CBG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Close Brothers Group plc reported a net income of -64.40M and revenue of 358.00M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAF.L and CBG.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAF.L and CBG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer