PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAF.L vs. PROK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAF.L vs. PROK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Airtel Africa plc (AAF.L) and ProKidney Corp. (PROK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AAF.L is traded in GBp, while PROK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PROK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAF.L achieves a -4.00% return, which is significantly higher than PROK's -17.08% return.


AAF.L

1D
1.49%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
-4.00%
6M
8.53%
1Y
88.88%
3Y*
43.77%
5Y*
37.61%
10Y*

PROK

1D
6.94%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-17.08%
6M
-28.51%
1Y
136.75%
3Y*
-47.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAF.L vs. PROK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AAF.L
Airtel Africa plc
-4.00%218.32%-9.69%20.11%-24.21%
PROK
ProKidney Corp.
-17.08%23.10%-3.40%-75.35%-21.88%

Correlation

The correlation between AAF.L and PROK is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AAF.L:

£12.44B

PROK:

$262.56B

EPS

AAF.L:

£0.18

PROK:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

AAF.L:

1.95

PROK:

74.04K

PB Ratio

AAF.L:

3.95

PROK:

997.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

AAF.L:

£6.37B

PROK:

$889.00K

Gross Profit (TTM)

AAF.L:

£3.93B

PROK:

-$2.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

AAF.L:

£2.98B

PROK:

-$112.46M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAF.L vs. PROK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAF.L
AAF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PROK
PROK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PROK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PROK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PROK Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PROK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PROK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAF.L vs. PROK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airtel Africa plc (AAF.L) and ProKidney Corp. (PROK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAF.LPROKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.79

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

1.97

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

2.61

+10.53

AAF.L vs. PROK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the PROK Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAF.L and PROK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAF.LPROKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

0.26

+1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

-0.12

+0.77

Drawdowns

AAF.L vs. PROK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAF.L drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, smaller than the maximum PROK drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAF.L and PROK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAF.LPROKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.78%

-96.46%

+30.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.56%

-69.67%

+44.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.08%

-96.09%

+65.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.85%

-87.81%

+68.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.26%

-65.88%

+47.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.71%

52.53%

-45.82%

Volatility

AAF.L vs. PROK - Volatility Comparison

Airtel Africa plc (AAF.L) has a higher volatility of 26.04% compared to ProKidney Corp. (PROK) at 19.49%. This indicates that AAF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PROK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAF.LPROKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.04%

19.49%

+6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.47%

50.80%

-17.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.71%

526.28%

-484.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.44%

284.79%

-249.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.23%

284.79%

-238.56%

Dividends

AAF.L vs. PROK - Dividend Comparison

AAF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while PROK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AAF.L
Airtel Africa plc
1.12%1.07%3.31%2.76%3.21%1.80%3.71%2.26%
PROK
ProKidney Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AAF.L vs. PROK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airtel Africa plc and ProKidney Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.71B
226.00K
(AAF.L) Total Revenue
(PROK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AAF.L values in GBp, PROK values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


AAF.L and PROK have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAF.L and PROK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer