PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 8.94% return.


AAEQ

1D
-1.35%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
5.97%
6M
4.57%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
8.94%
6M
7.85%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and ITOT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.98

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAEQ
ITOT

Technology

40.5%
37.2%

Communication Services

12.2%
9.8%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.8%

Industrials

6.1%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.3%

Energy

2.9%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.3%

Utilities

1.5%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.0%

Technology

AAEQ
40.5%
ITOT
37.2%

Communication Services

AAEQ
12.2%
ITOT
9.8%

Financial Services

AAEQ
11.6%
ITOT
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AAEQ
9.1%
ITOT
9.8%

Healthcare

AAEQ
9.0%
ITOT
8.8%

Industrials

AAEQ
6.1%
ITOT
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

AAEQ
4.5%
ITOT
4.3%

Energy

AAEQ
2.9%
ITOT
3.3%

Real Estate

AAEQ
1.6%
ITOT
2.3%

Utilities

AAEQ
1.5%
ITOT
2.1%

Basic Materials

AAEQ
1.1%
ITOT
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAEQITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-55.20%

+44.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-2.79%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-6.96%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

12.85%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

17.46%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

18.28%

-3.96%

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than ITOT's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAEQ
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, AAEQ and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AAEQ.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.03% for ITOT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer