PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAEQ vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAEQ achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


AAEQ

1D
-0.75%
1M
4.79%
YTD
8.91%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAEQ and AFOS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAEQAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

4.35

-3.26

Drawdowns

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAEQ drawdown since its inception was -10.26%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAEQ and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAEQAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.26%

-11.52%

+1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-0.29%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-1.37%

-1.09%

Volatility

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAEQAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

20.19%

-6.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.72%

20.19%

-6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.72%

20.19%

-6.47%

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAEQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAEQ vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

AAEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAEQ and AFOS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAEQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAEQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.09% for AAEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAEQ and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAEQ and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer