AADR vs. DRIV
AADR (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AADR is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AADR returned 6.23%/yr vs 9.49%/yr for DRIV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AADR charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
AADR vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AADR achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.
AADR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 9.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
DRIV
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 42.27%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 92.43%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- —
AADR vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | -1.56% | 25.63% | 24.58% | 18.67% | -22.93% | 6.48% | 13.13% | 35.35% | -32.34% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 42.27% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between AADR and DRIV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between AADR and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
AADR vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AADR
DRIV
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Healthcare
AADR
DRIV
-
Basic Materials
AADR
DRIV
Financial Services
AADR
DRIV
-
Industrials
AADR
DRIV
Technology
AADR
DRIV
Energy
AADR
DRIV
-
Communication Services
AADR
DRIV
Utilities
AADR
DRIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
AADR
DRIV
Consumer Defensive
AADR
DRIV
-
Real Estate
AADR
-
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AADR vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
AADR
DRIV
AADR vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AADR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.55 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 6.92 | -6.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 24.10 | -22.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AADR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 3.70 | -3.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.35 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.54 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
AADR vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AADR drawdown since its inception was -45.01%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AADR and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AADR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.01% | -41.93% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.30% | -13.43% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.61% | -34.18% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.80% | -41.93% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.54% | -1.04% | -11.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -15.13% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.82% | 3.85% | +2.97% |
Volatility
AADR vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF (AADR) is 6.34%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that AADR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AADR | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 9.36% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.55% | 19.29% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 25.14% | -3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 27.07% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 27.40% | -5.20% |
AADR vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AADR has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AADR vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
AADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DRIV's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AADR AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF | 0.54% | 0.49% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 3.65% | 0.92% | 0.11% | 0.58% | 0.75% | 0.74% | 0.58% | 0.81% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.75% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AADR and DRIV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to AADR (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AADR dropped -45.01% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 9.49% vs 6.23% for AADR. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, AADR has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 9.49% return vs 6.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for AADR.
DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.54% for AADR.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for AADR and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AADR and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer