AABFX vs. TMCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AABFX (Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund) and TMCGX (Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - AABFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Thrivent, while TMCGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 5 years, AABFX returned 5.66%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for TMCGX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AABFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for TMCGX.

Performance

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than TMCGX's 10.01% return.

AABFX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.58%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.92%
• 1Y: 15.32%
• 3Y*: 11.81%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 6.75%

TMCGX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 5.86%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: 14.67%
• 3Y*: 10.41%
• 5Y*: 2.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund	5.63%	12.23%	10.08%	12.04%	-13.93%	11.83%	14.64%
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	10.01%	2.48%	10.20%	16.94%	-28.27%	11.39%	53.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AABFX and TMCGX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	0.84

The correlation between AABFX and TMCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AABFX vs. TMCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AABFX

AABFX Risk / Return Rank: 70
AABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
AABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
AABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
AABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

TMCGX

TMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 12
TMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AABFX	TMCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	0.93	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	1.40	+2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.17	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	1.09	+1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	3.60	+9.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AABFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the TMCGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AABFX and TMCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AABFX	TMCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	0.93	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.13	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.40	+0.02

Drawdowns

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than TMCGX's maximum drawdown of -39.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and TMCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AABFX	TMCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.44%	-39.66%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.13%	-14.58%	+9.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.04%	-25.28%	+18.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.56%	-39.66%	+18.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.39%	+3.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-15.94%	+10.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.16%	4.42%	-3.26%

Volatility

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) is 2.13%, while Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that AABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AABFX	TMCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	4.02%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.16%	13.76%	-8.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.33%	17.03%	-10.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.53%	22.25%	-13.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.31%	24.19%	-14.88%

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TMCGX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

AABFX vs. TMCGX - Dividend Comparison

AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, while TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AABFX Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund	6.84%	7.25%	6.43%	2.97%	2.26%	6.99%	2.03%	2.37%	9.70%	2.04%	2.37%	1.90%
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.13%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AABFX and TMCGX in my portfolio?

AABFX and TMCGX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AABFX or TMCGX?

TMCGX has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to AABFX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AABFX dropped -43.44% vs TMCGX's -39.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.