TMCGX vs. LSVQX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TMCGX (Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund) and LSVQX (LSV Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - TMCGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while LSVQX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by LSV. Over the past 5 years, TMCGX returned 2.55%/yr vs 7.50%/yr for LSVQX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMCGX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for LSVQX.

Performance

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMCGX achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than LSVQX's 13.01% return.

TMCGX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 13.76%
• 3Y*: 10.34%
• 5Y*: 2.55%
• 10Y*: —

LSVQX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 13.01%
• 6M: 13.33%
• 1Y: 28.02%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: 7.50%
• 10Y*: 8.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	9.82%	2.48%	10.20%	16.94%	-28.27%	11.39%	53.73%
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund	13.01%	7.31%	4.23%	19.02%	-6.24%	34.54%	13.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TMCGX and LSVQX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020	0.71

The correlation between TMCGX and LSVQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TMCGX vs. LSVQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMCGX

TMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 12
TMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

LSVQX

LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 46
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMCGX	LSVQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.75	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	2.59	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.31	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	3.21	-2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.28	9.49	-6.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the LSVQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMCGX and LSVQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMCGX	LSVQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	1.75	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.37	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.40	0.00

Drawdowns

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum LSVQX drawdown of -54.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMCGX and LSVQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMCGX	LSVQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.66%	-54.77%	+15.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.58%	-8.48%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.28%	-25.76%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.66%	-25.76%	-13.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-0.67%	-2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.94%	-7.45%	-8.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	2.86%	+1.56%

Volatility

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund (TMCGX) and LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMCGX	LSVQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	4.15%	-0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	10.42%	+3.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	15.63%	+1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.25%	20.36%	+1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.18%	24.30%	-0.12%

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMCGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVQX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMCGX vs. LSVQX - Dividend Comparison

TMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund	7.19%	8.13%	1.78%	4.73%	2.02%	1.45%	1.83%	2.04%	7.00%	4.78%	2.35%	3.59%
TMCGX Thrivent Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.13%	2.82%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMCGX and LSVQX in my portfolio?

TMCGX and LSVQX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMCGX or LSVQX?

LSVQX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to TMCGX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMCGX dropped -39.66% vs LSVQX's -54.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.