PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AABFX vs. FYMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AABFX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than FYMIX's 9.38% return.


AABFX

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.69%
YTD
5.21%
6M
5.56%
1Y
14.54%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
6.71%

FYMIX

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.11%
YTD
9.38%
6M
10.23%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AABFX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund
5.21%12.23%10.08%12.04%-10.86%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
9.38%18.95%11.09%16.15%-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between AABFX and FYMIX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.94

The correlation between AABFX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AABFX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AABFX
AABFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AABFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AABFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AABFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AABFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AABFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FYMIX
FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AABFXFYMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.71

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

11.73

+1.09

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AABFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AABFX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AABFXFYMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.21

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.66

-0.24

Drawdowns

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AABFX drawdown since its inception was -43.44%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AABFX and FYMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AABFXFYMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

-22.70%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.13%

-8.80%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.04%

-12.72%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.69%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-5.64%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

2.03%

-0.87%

Volatility

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund (AABFX) is 2.15%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that AABFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AABFXFYMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.15%

3.60%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.16%

8.88%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.35%

10.81%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.53%

12.73%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.31%

12.73%

-3.42%

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AABFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AABFX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

AABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than FYMIX's 3.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AABFX
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus Fund
6.87%7.25%6.43%2.97%2.26%6.99%2.03%2.37%9.70%2.04%2.37%1.90%
FYMIX
Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund
3.37%3.69%1.84%1.78%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AABFX and FYMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYMIX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to AABFX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AABFX dropped -43.44% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

AABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AABFX and FYMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer