AAAU vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. AAAU is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAAU charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

AAAU vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 44.22% return.

AAAU

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.14%
• 1Y: 22.47%
• 3Y*: 29.19%
• 5Y*: 17.33%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 44.22%
• 6M: 48.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAU vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	-2.40%	29.96%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	44.22%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAU and SGRT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.35

Return for Risk

AAAU vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 26
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAU vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAU	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	—	—

Drawdowns

AAAU vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -24.38%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAU	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.38%	-17.87%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.95%	-4.78%	-17.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-3.24%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAU	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.10%	34.85%	-7.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	34.85%	-16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	34.85%	-17.72%

AAAU vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAU vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAU and SGRT in my portfolio?

AAAU and SGRT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAAU or SGRT?

On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAU or SGRT?

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAU or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.

What is the main difference between AAAU and SGRT?

AAAU is categorized as Gold, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AAAU and 0.59% for SGRT.