AAAU vs. SGOL
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL).
AAAU and SGOL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AAAU is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jul 26, 2018. SGOL is a passively managed fund by Abrdn Plc that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). It was launched on Sep 9, 2009. Both AAAU and SGOL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AAAU or SGOL.
Correlation
The correlation between AAAU and SGOL is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AAAU vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AAAU:
2.43
SGOL:
2.43
AAAU:
3.35
SGOL:
3.35
AAAU:
1.43
SGOL:
1.43
AAAU:
5.35
SGOL:
5.37
AAAU:
14.35
SGOL:
14.40
AAAU:
3.03%
SGOL:
3.03%
AAAU:
17.35%
SGOL:
17.40%
AAAU:
-21.63%
SGOL:
-45.51%
AAAU:
-2.82%
SGOL:
-2.76%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAAU having a 26.74% return and SGOL slightly higher at 26.79%.
AAAU
26.74%
7.52%
23.80%
41.68%
14.10%
N/A
SGOL
26.79%
7.62%
23.87%
41.79%
14.14%
10.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAAU vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AAAU vs. SGOL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AAAU
SGOL
AAAU vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AAAU vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison
Neither AAAU nor SGOL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AAAU vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum SGOL drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and SGOL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AAAU vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) have volatilities of 8.51% and 8.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.