PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAU vs. GEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAU vs. GEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAU achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than GEM's 26.12% return.


AAAU

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
3.83%
6M
6.34%
1Y
32.55%
3Y*
31.47%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*

GEM

1D
-1.13%
1M
6.24%
YTD
26.12%
6M
29.03%
1Y
50.97%
3Y*
23.48%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAU vs. GEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
3.83%64.06%26.91%12.96%-0.50%-4.01%25.02%18.17%9.20%
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
26.12%33.43%6.66%11.82%-21.33%-0.19%13.23%17.79%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAU and GEM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.24

The correlation between AAAU and GEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAU vs. GEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAU
AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GEM
GEM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAU vs. GEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAAUGEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.80

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

14.69

-10.48

AAAU vs. GEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the GEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAU and GEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAAUGEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.63

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.44

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.52

+0.57

Drawdowns

AAAU vs. GEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAU drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum GEM drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAU and GEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAUGEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-37.02%

+15.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.13%

-13.50%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-16.54%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

-35.43%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.97%

-2.16%

-14.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-12.01%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

3.48%

+4.28%

Volatility

AAAU vs. GEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) is 5.51%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that AAAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAUGEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

8.61%

-3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.94%

17.01%

+5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.33%

19.55%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

17.71%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

19.03%

-2.04%

AAAU vs. GEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAU has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GEM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAU vs. GEM - Dividend Comparison

AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GEM
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.83%2.30%2.58%2.97%2.96%3.00%1.63%3.13%2.08%1.81%1.98%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAU and GEM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEM has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to AAAU (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAU dropped -21.63% vs GEM's -37.02%.

On 5-year performance, AAAU leads with 18.60% vs 7.67% for GEM. On fees, AAAU is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, AAAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AAAU has performed better with a 18.60% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAAU is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GEM.

GEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for AAAU.

AAAU is categorized as Gold, while GEM is Emerging Markets Equities. AAAU tracks LBMA Gold PM Price, while GEM tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AAAU and 0.45% for GEM.

GEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAU and GEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer