AAAGX vs. AALGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAAGX (Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund) and AALGX (Thrivent Global Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - AAAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while AALGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX returned 17.14%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for AALGX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAAGX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for AALGX.

Performance

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAGX achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly lower than AALGX's 10.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAGX has outperformed AALGX with an annualized return of 17.14%, while AALGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.37% annualized return.

AAAGX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 3.89%
• YTD: 5.37%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 21.89%
• 3Y*: 25.99%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 17.14%

AALGX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 11.89%
• 1Y: 26.08%
• 3Y*: 23.88%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	5.37%	16.12%	39.55%	46.09%	-34.10%	22.05%	42.49%	31.64%	1.43%	24.42%
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund	10.96%	20.49%	27.79%	21.71%	-19.38%	20.37%	14.46%	22.71%	-8.75%	10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAGX and AALGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1999	0.92

The correlation between AAAGX and AALGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AAAGX vs. AALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAGX

AAAGX Risk / Return Rank: 20
AAAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
AAAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AAAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AAAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
AAAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

AALGX

AALGX Risk / Return Rank: 56
AALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
AALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
AALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) and Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAAGX	AALGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.15	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	2.99	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.39	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	2.90	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	12.78	-8.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the AALGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAGX and AALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAAGX	AALGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	2.15	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.66	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.62	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.45	-0.12

Drawdowns

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAGX drawdown since its inception was -64.98%, which is greater than AALGX's maximum drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAGX and AALGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAGX	AALGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.98%	-55.28%	-9.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.76%	-9.10%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.44%	-16.65%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.41%	-34.65%	-5.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	-35.32%	-5.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.56%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.87%	-10.50%	-13.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	2.06%	+2.95%

Volatility

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund (AAAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that AAAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAGX	AALGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.30%	+0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.21%	9.69%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.00%	12.27%	+3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.74%	18.68%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	18.33%	+3.38%

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAGX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than AALGX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAGX vs. AALGX - Dividend Comparison

AAAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than AALGX's 9.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AAAGX Thrivent Large Cap Growth Fund	3.57%	3.77%	14.46%	3.55%	9.38%	6.93%	7.74%	5.39%	12.26%	0.00%	0.60%
AALGX Thrivent Global Stock Fund	9.96%	11.05%	23.12%	5.51%	3.21%	14.40%	3.01%	12.68%	9.82%	1.00%	1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAGX and AALGX in my portfolio?

AAAGX and AALGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAGX or AALGX?

AAAGX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to AALGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAGX dropped -64.98% vs AALGX's -55.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AALGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.