PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAC vs. BCLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAC vs. BCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAC achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than BCLO's 2.79% return.


AAAC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
2.06%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCLO

1D
0.05%
1M
1.24%
YTD
2.79%
6M
3.32%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAC vs. BCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.06%0.20%
BCLO
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
2.79%0.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAC and BCLO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAC vs. BCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAC

BCLO
BCLO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAC vs. BCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) and iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF (BCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAAC vs. BCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAACBCLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.56

1.42

+4.15

Drawdowns

AAAC vs. BCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAC drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum BCLO drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAC and BCLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAACBCLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-4.45%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.40%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

Volatility

AAAC vs. BCLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAACBCLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

2.03%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.89%

4.39%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.89%

4.39%

-3.50%

AAAC vs. BCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAC has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BCLO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAC vs. BCLO - Dividend Comparison

AAAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than BCLO's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AAAC
Columbia AAA CLO ETF
2.27%0.03%
BCLO
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF
6.59%6.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAC and BCLO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAAC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAAC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BCLO.

BCLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AAAC and 0.45% for BCLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAC and BCLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer