PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAA vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAA vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAA achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's 4.81% return.


AAAA

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.71%
6M
9.20%
YTD
10.99%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOM

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.51%
6M
3.55%
YTD
4.81%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAA vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAAA and EAOM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.91

The correlation between AAAA and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAA vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAA
AAAA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAA vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAAAEAOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.30

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.21

9.91

+2.30

AAAA vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAA and EAOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAAA vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAA drawdown since its inception was -7.83%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAA and EAOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAAEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-20.73%

+12.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-5.17%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-0.70%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.08%

-4.88%

+3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.20%

+0.60%

Volatility

AAAA vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF (AAAA) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 1.87%. This indicates that AAAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAAEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

1.87%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

5.81%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

6.82%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

8.15%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

7.92%

+3.81%

AAAA vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAA vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

AAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than EAOM's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AAAA
Amplius Aggressive Asset Allocation ETF
1.29%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.87%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AAAA and EAOM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAAA has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to EAOM (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAA dropped -7.83% vs EAOM's -20.73%.

On 1-year performance, AAAA leads with 21.98% vs 11.87% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOM has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAAA has performed better with a 21.98% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for AAAA.

EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.29% for AAAA.

They also come from different issuers: Amplius and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for AAAA and 0.18% for EAOM.

AAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAA and EAOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer