AA vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AA or MSFT.
Correlation
The correlation between AA and MSFT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AA vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AA:
-0.67
MSFT:
-0.63
AA:
-0.78
MSFT:
-0.71
AA:
0.91
MSFT:
0.91
AA:
-0.45
MSFT:
-0.61
AA:
-1.64
MSFT:
-1.44
AA:
19.80%
MSFT:
9.59%
AA:
48.24%
MSFT:
22.01%
AA:
-90.90%
MSFT:
-69.39%
AA:
-73.02%
MSFT:
-22.59%
Fundamentals
AA:
$6.42B
MSFT:
$2.68T
AA:
$0.26
MSFT:
$12.41
AA:
95.42
MSFT:
29.00
AA:
-0.29
MSFT:
1.71
AA:
$9.30B
MSFT:
$199.94B
AA:
$1.66B
MSFT:
$138.36B
AA:
$1.27B
MSFT:
$109.35B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a -34.12% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's -14.46% return.
AA
-34.12%
-23.38%
-36.22%
-30.20%
34.03%
N/A
MSFT
-14.46%
-10.27%
-13.17%
-13.23%
19.62%
26.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AA vs. MSFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AA
MSFT
AA vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AA vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than MSFT's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AA Alcoa Corporation | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 0.88% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.88% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
AA vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AA vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Alcoa Corporation (AA) has a higher volatility of 19.77% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 7.61%. This indicates that AA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AA vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alcoa Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities