PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AA vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AA vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -23.71% return.


AA

1D
-1.72%
1M
-18.25%
YTD
10.16%
6M
8.97%
1Y
111.41%
3Y*
22.54%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*

MSFT

1D
-3.18%
1M
-12.24%
YTD
-23.71%
6M
-23.91%
1Y
-22.44%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
23.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AA vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AA
Alcoa Corporation
10.16%42.46%12.43%-24.33%-23.12%159.05%7.16%-19.07%-50.66%91.84%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-23.71%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AA and MSFT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016

0.24

The correlation between AA and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AA:

$15.38B

MSFT:

$2.73T

EPS

AA:

$3.92

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

AA:

14.89

MSFT:

21.88

PEG Ratio

AA:

0.04

MSFT:

1.53

PS Ratio

AA:

1.21

MSFT:

8.61

PB Ratio

AA:

2.25

MSFT:

6.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

AA:

$12.66B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AA:

$948.00M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

AA:

$1.70B

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AA vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AA
AA Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AA vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alcoa Corporation (AA) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.86

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

-0.66

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

-1.32

+15.59

AA vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AA Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AA and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AA vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AA drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AA and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.90%

-69.38%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.36%

-33.91%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.25%

-33.91%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.46%

-37.15%

-38.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.74%

-31.80%

-3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-21.79%

-24.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.84%

16.97%

-9.13%

Volatility

AA vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Alcoa Corporation (AA) has a higher volatility of 21.88% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.08%. This indicates that AA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.88%

11.08%

+10.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.59%

22.93%

+18.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.14%

26.01%

+29.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.31%

26.78%

+29.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.68%

27.11%

+28.57%

Dividends

AA vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than MSFT's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AA
Alcoa Corporation
0.69%0.75%1.06%1.18%0.88%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.32%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.97%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

AA vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alcoa Corporation and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
3.19B
82.89B
(AA) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AA vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alcoa Corporation and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
67.6%
Portfolio components
AA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

AA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

AA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AA and MSFT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AA has higher volatility (21.88%) compared to MSFT (11.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AA dropped -90.90% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

AA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AA and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer