9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE
9W1.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) are both China Equities funds - 9W1.DE tracks the MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped while CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 9W1.DE returned -1.03% vs 20.24% for CHIN.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 9W1.DE charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CHIN.DE.
Performance
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 9W1.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than CHIN.DE's 3.48% return.
9W1.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- 6M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 1Y
- -1.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- -5.87%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
9W1.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -6.89% | 16.44% | 21.98% | -13.36% |
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 3.48% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between 9W1.DE and CHIN.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between 9W1.DE and CHIN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
9W1.DE
CHIN.DE
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) and KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 9W1.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 2.30 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 5.60 | -5.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 9W1.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than CHIN.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 9W1.DE and CHIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 9W1.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -22.95% | -30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.08% | -8.84% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.03% | -5.96% | -24.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.67% | -7.61% | -24.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 3.62% | +6.86% |
Volatility
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (9W1.DE) is 5.34%, while KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that 9W1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 9W1.DE | CHIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 7.38% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 13.49% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.23% | 18.68% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 22.48% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.63% | 22.48% | +6.15% |
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
9W1.DE has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
9W1.DE vs. CHIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 9W1.DE nor CHIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
9W1.DE and CHIN.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 9W1.DE is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
9W1.DE is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
9W1.DE tracks MSCI China Select SRI S-Series 10% Capped, while CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for 9W1.DE and 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for 9W1.DE and CHIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer