PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSE.DE achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than G2XJ.DE's -3.74% return.


8PSE.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
0.15%
6M
4.44%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
15.46%
10Y*

G2XJ.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
-7.94%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
7.08%
1Y
60.21%
3Y*
42.43%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
8PSE.DE
Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.15%62.78%24.11%10.00%-2.18%-5.81%2.14%
G2XJ.DE
VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS
-3.74%149.58%21.45%3.64%-6.09%-15.55%-5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSE.DE and G2XJ.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020

0.75

The correlation between 8PSE.DE and G2XJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSE.DE
8PSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

G2XJ.DE
G2XJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
G2XJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


8PSE.DEG2XJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.23

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

2.11

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

5.07

-2.76

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the G2XJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSE.DE and G2XJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


8PSE.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

1.33

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.50

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.39

-0.22

Drawdowns

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, roughly equal to the maximum G2XJ.DE drawdown of -49.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSE.DE and G2XJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSE.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.81%

-49.96%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.81%

-29.24%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.81%

-29.24%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.81%

-40.82%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.31%

-25.97%

+9.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-25.26%

+15.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.27%

12.16%

+0.11%

Volatility

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (8PSE.DE) is 5.95%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners UCITS (G2XJ.DE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that 8PSE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G2XJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSE.DEG2XJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

15.07%

-9.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.01%

38.04%

+32.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

181.73%

46.48%

+135.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.63%

36.98%

+50.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.06%

37.69%

+43.37%

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSE.DE has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than G2XJ.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

8PSE.DE vs. G2XJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 8PSE.DE nor G2XJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSE.DE and G2XJ.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSE.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.

8PSE.DE is categorized as Gold, while G2XJ.DE is Precious Metals. 8PSE.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM (EUR Hedged), while G2XJ.DE tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for 8PSE.DE and 0.55% for G2XJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSE.DE and G2XJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer