7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE
7RIP.DE (HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF) and M37R.DE (HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 7RIP.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Solactive Travel, while M37R.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 7RIP.DE returned 11.78% vs -5.22% for M37R.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 7RIP.DE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for M37R.DE.
Performance
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly higher than M37R.DE's -6.38% return.
7RIP.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M37R.DE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- -6.38%
- 6M
- -12.87%
- 1Y
- -5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
7RIP.DE HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | -2.92% | 5.32% | 21.92% |
M37R.DE HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF | -6.38% | -10.17% | 28.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and M37R.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE — Risk / Return Rank
7RIP.DE
M37R.DE
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 7RIP.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.99 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | -0.13 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | -0.27 | +2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 7RIP.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | -0.18 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.15 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum M37R.DE drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and M37R.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 7RIP.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -38.85% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -38.85% | +24.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -24.62% | +17.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -14.24% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 18.99% | -12.69% |
Volatility
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) is 6.05%, while HANetf ETC Group Global Metaverse UCITS ETF (M37R.DE) has a volatility of 10.35%. This indicates that 7RIP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than M37R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 7RIP.DE | M37R.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 10.35% | -4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 20.98% | -2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 28.65% | -5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 32.04% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 32.04% | -7.05% |
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than M37R.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
7RIP.DE vs. M37R.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 7RIP.DE nor M37R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
7RIP.DE and M37R.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M37R.DE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M37R.DE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for 7RIP.DE.
7RIP.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while M37R.DE is Technology Equities. 7RIP.DE tracks Solactive Travel, while M37R.DE tracks Solactive ETC Group Global Metaverse. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for 7RIP.DE and 0.65% for M37R.DE.
Find the right allocation for 7RIP.DE and M37R.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer