7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE
7RIP.DE (HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF) and E61Z.DE (Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - 7RIP.DE tracks the Solactive Travel while E61Z.DE tracks the Solactive E-commerce. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 7RIP.DE returned 17.09%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for E61Z.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 7RIP.DE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for E61Z.DE.
Performance
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than E61Z.DE's -15.24% return.
7RIP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 11.67%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 29.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- —
E61Z.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -15.24%
- 6M
- -14.26%
- 1Y
- -6.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7RIP.DE HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | 9.35% | 5.32% | 33.59% | 26.46% | -14.00% | -4.85% |
E61Z.DE Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -15.24% | 7.18% | 37.44% | 27.85% | -36.99% | -15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and E61Z.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and E61Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank
7RIP.DE
E61Z.DE
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 7RIP.DE | E61Z.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.96 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.27 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | -0.50 | +5.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum E61Z.DE drawdown of -49.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and E61Z.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 7RIP.DE | E61Z.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -49.16% | +18.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -25.19% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.05% | -30.13% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.85% | +21.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -25.66% | +16.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 13.74% | -7.52% |
Volatility
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Global X E-commerce UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (E61Z.DE) at 6.35%. This indicates that 7RIP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than E61Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 7RIP.DE | E61Z.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.15% | 6.35% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.42% | 15.31% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.96% | 19.77% | +3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.15% | 27.16% | -2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 27.16% | -2.07% |
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than E61Z.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
7RIP.DE vs. E61Z.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 7RIP.DE nor E61Z.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
7RIP.DE and E61Z.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, E61Z.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
E61Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for 7RIP.DE.
7RIP.DE tracks Solactive Travel, while E61Z.DE tracks Solactive E-commerce. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for 7RIP.DE and 0.50% for E61Z.DE.
Find the right allocation for 7RIP.DE and E61Z.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer