PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
7RIP.DE
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF
-7.16%5.32%33.59%26.46%-14.00%-9.48%
EMQQ.DE
HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF
-17.62%5.41%20.08%1.14%-23.93%-29.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a -7.16% return, which is significantly higher than EMQQ.DE's -17.62% return.


7RIP.DE

1D
3.54%
1M
-3.33%
YTD
-7.16%
6M
2.15%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
10Y*

EMQQ.DE

1D
1.78%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-17.62%
6M
-26.33%
1Y
-18.63%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-12.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQQ.DE's 0.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

7RIP.DE
7RIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

EMQQ.DE
EMQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


7RIP.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

-0.85

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

-1.14

+2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.87

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

-0.62

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.77

-1.64

+4.41

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 7RIP.DE and EMQQ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


7RIP.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

-0.85

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.08

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between 7RIP.DE and EMQQ.DE is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 7RIP.DE nor EMQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum EMQQ.DE drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and EMQQ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


7RIP.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-67.94%

+36.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.15%

-28.66%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-56.48%

+45.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-35.33%

+25.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

10.93%

-5.99%

Volatility

7RIP.DE vs. EMQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) at 7.34%. This indicates that 7RIP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


7RIP.DEEMQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

7.34%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.79%

14.12%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.02%

21.77%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.72%

31.03%

-6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

30.93%

-6.21%