PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

6AQQ.DE is traded in EUR, while MDLZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MDLZ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 21.35%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.75% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
2.51%
1M
1.82%
YTD
18.30%
6M
19.72%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
21.35%

MDLZ

1D
-0.50%
1M
4.75%
YTD
19.85%
6M
20.41%
1Y
-2.90%
3Y*
-4.23%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
18.30%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.23%15.90%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
19.85%-18.06%-9.71%7.84%9.30%24.54%-0.37%43.60%0.23%-13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and MDLZ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010

0.21

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


6AQQ.DEMDLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.98

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

-0.17

+3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.43

-0.30

+10.73

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and MDLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -34.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and MDLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DEMDLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-34.38%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-25.68%

+15.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-34.38%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-34.38%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-34.38%

+3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-18.31%

+15.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-8.75%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

14.42%

-10.98%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) is 5.37%, while Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DEMDLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

5.73%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

16.12%

-4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

21.51%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

19.25%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

21.37%

-1.70%

Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.13%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


6AQQ.DE and MDLZ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and MDLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer