PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6AQQ.DE achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly higher than LYYB.DE's 11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, 6AQQ.DE has outperformed LYYB.DE with an annualized return of 20.24%, while LYYB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.66% annualized return.


6AQQ.DE

1D
1.19%
1M
-4.44%
6M
17.15%
YTD
16.74%
1Y
28.19%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
20.24%
ALL TIME*
20.20%

LYYB.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
0.63%
6M
11.30%
YTD
11.42%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
13.66%
ALL TIME*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
16.74%7.08%33.77%51.54%-29.96%39.62%34.72%42.90%3.23%15.90%
LYYB.DE
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist
11.42%2.83%31.27%22.21%-17.02%38.79%9.55%34.69%-1.22%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and LYYB.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010

0.90

The correlation between 6AQQ.DE and LYYB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

LYYB.DE
LYYB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
LYYB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


6AQQ.DELYYB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.52

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.97

8.51

-0.54

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the LYYB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6AQQ.DE and LYYB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, smaller than the maximum LYYB.DE drawdown of -53.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6AQQ.DE and LYYB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6AQQ.DELYYB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-53.38%

+22.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-8.32%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-24.11%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-24.11%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.19%

-34.12%

+2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-1.02%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-9.09%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.47%

+1.06%

Volatility

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) at 3.08%. This indicates that 6AQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6AQQ.DELYYB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

3.08%

+2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

8.03%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

12.04%

+4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

15.64%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.74%

16.31%

+3.43%

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

6AQQ.DE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than LYYB.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

6AQQ.DE vs. LYYB.DE - Dividend Comparison

6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYYB.DE
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist
0.81%0.99%0.78%0.00%1.12%0.95%1.31%1.14%1.81%1.64%1.87%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, 6AQQ.DE and LYYB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LYYB.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.

6AQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LYYB.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE and 0.09% for LYYB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6AQQ.DE and LYYB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer