4MMR.DE vs. QYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4MMR.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD).
4MMR.DE and QYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 4MMR.DE is managed by Global X. QYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
4MMR.DE Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 14.51% | 58.75% | 13.11% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 2.15% | -3.68% | 14.08% |
Different Trading Currencies
4MMR.DE is traded in EUR, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 4MMR.DE achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 2.15% return.
4MMR.DE
- 1D
- 4.32%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 47.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 8.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
4MMR.DE
QYLD
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4MMR.DE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 4MMR.DE | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.93 | 0.46 | +1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 0.77 | +1.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 0.79 | +2.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | 2.60 | +7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 4MMR.DE | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 0.46 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.38 | 0.59 | +1.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between 4MMR.DE and QYLD is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
4MMR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.85%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4MMR.DE Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.85% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 4MMR.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 4MMR.DE and QYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 4MMR.DE | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -24.75% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -10.84% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -1.84% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -3.89% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 1.65% | +3.33% |
Volatility
4MMR.DE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X Defence Tech UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (4MMR.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.06%. This indicates that 4MMR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 4MMR.DE | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 4.06% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.91% | 8.10% | +8.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 18.78% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 15.48% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 16.68% | +8.16% |