3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L
3XLE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP) and 3PLT.L (Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3XLE.L is actively managed, while 3PLT.L is passively managed. Over the past year, 3XLE.L returned 63.46% vs -84.49% for 3PLT.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3XLE.L achieves a 48.54% return, which is significantly higher than 3PLT.L's -87.54% return.
3XLE.L
- 1D
- -6.13%
- 1M
- -25.00%
- YTD
- 48.54%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- 63.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3PLT.L
- 1D
- -21.89%
- 1M
- -57.79%
- YTD
- -87.54%
- 6M
- -89.97%
- 1Y
- -84.49%
- 3Y*
- -59.94%
- 5Y*
- -77.85%
- 10Y*
- —
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
3XLE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP | 48.54% | -17.73% | -41.08% |
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities | -87.54% | 154.21% | 1,666.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3XLE.L and 3PLT.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024 | 0.07 |
The correlation between 3XLE.L and 3PLT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L — Risk / Return Rank
3XLE.L
3PLT.L
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3XLE.L | 3PLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.93 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.91 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | -1.48 | +5.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3XLE.L drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, smaller than the maximum 3PLT.L drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XLE.L and 3PLT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3XLE.L | 3PLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.70% | -100.00% | +35.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.33% | -92.86% | +49.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.33% | -99.95% | +56.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.41% | -93.42% | +58.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.39% | 56.91% | -40.52% |
Volatility
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) is 24.14%, while Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a volatility of 55.53%. This indicates that 3XLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3PLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3XLE.L | 3PLT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.14% | 55.53% | -31.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.80% | 116.63% | -56.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.63% | 151.66% | -83.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 200.11% | -131.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 199.77% | -131.16% |
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3XLE.L and 3PLT.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3XLE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3XLE.L nor 3PLT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3XLE.L and 3PLT.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3XLE.L and 3PLT.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3XLE.L and 3PLT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer