PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3XLE.L is traded in GBp, while MAG7.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAG7.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3XLE.L achieves a 98.06% return, which is significantly higher than MAG7.L's -4.96% return.


3XLE.L

1D
6.81%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
98.06%
6M
87.16%
1Y
122.22%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
10Y*

MAG7.L

1D
-8.61%
1M
7.99%
YTD
-4.96%
6M
-7.01%
1Y
112.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
3XLE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP
98.06%-17.73%-32.85%
MAG7.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities
-4.96%-33.53%153.25%

Correlation

The correlation between 3XLE.L and MAG7.L is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between 3XLE.L and MAG7.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3XLE.L
3XLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
3XLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MAG7.L
MAG7.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3XLE.LMAG7.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.56

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

3.77

+4.78

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3XLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3XLE.L and MAG7.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3XLE.LMAG7.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.15

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.19

+0.14

Drawdowns

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3XLE.L drawdown since its inception was -74.89%, smaller than the maximum MAG7.L drawdown of -91.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XLE.L and MAG7.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3XLE.LMAG7.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.89%

-91.62%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.26%

-71.53%

+32.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.69%

-51.38%

+19.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-48.64%

+3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.25%

29.61%

-15.36%

Volatility

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) is 25.62%, while Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) has a volatility of 27.06%. This indicates that 3XLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAG7.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3XLE.LMAG7.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.62%

27.06%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.75%

70.51%

-12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.19%

96.80%

-29.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.23%

123.97%

-41.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.23%

123.97%

-41.74%

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3XLE.L and MAG7.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

3XLE.L vs. MAG7.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3XLE.L nor MAG7.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


3XLE.L and MAG7.L have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3XLE.L and MAG7.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3XLE.L and MAG7.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer