3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L).
3XLE.L and 3AAP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3XLE.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Dec 10, 2021. 3AAP.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020.
Performance
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3XLE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP | 157.28% | -17.73% | -12.65% | -29.34% | 191.33% | -3.39% |
3AAP.L Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP | -28.57% | -28.23% | 70.02% | 151.70% | -73.70% | 5.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3XLE.L achieves a 157.28% return, which is significantly higher than 3AAP.L's -28.57% return.
3XLE.L
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 46.81%
- YTD
- 157.28%
- 6M
- 154.81%
- 1Y
- 71.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3AAP.L
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -21.46%
- YTD
- -28.57%
- 6M
- -17.43%
- 1Y
- -9.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3XLE.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
3XLE.L
3AAP.L
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3XLE.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | -0.08 | +1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 0.71 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | -0.25 | +1.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | -0.44 | +2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3XLE.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | -0.08 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.28 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between 3XLE.L and 3AAP.L is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3XLE.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3XLE.L drawdown since its inception was -74.89%, roughly equal to the maximum 3AAP.L drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XLE.L and 3AAP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3XLE.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.89% | -75.66% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.60% | -54.75% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.27% | -50.12% | +38.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.52% | -35.02% | -10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.36% | 30.65% | +1.71% |
Volatility
3XLE.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Oil & Gas ETP Securities GBP (3XLE.L) has a higher volatility of 19.25% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) at 14.96%. This indicates that 3XLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3AAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 3XLE.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.25% | 14.96% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.75% | 61.76% | -20.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.08% | 110.52% | -42.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.29% | 86.69% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.29% | 89.32% | -8.03% |