3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L).
3PLT.L and SLVI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 3PLT.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021. SLVI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.
Performance
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities | -61.63% | 50.13% |
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | 2.46% | 76.34% |
Different Trading Currencies
3PLT.L is traded in GBp, while SLVI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3PLT.L achieves a -61.63% return, which is significantly lower than SLVI.L's 2.46% return.
3PLT.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- -61.63%
- 6M
- -70.36%
- 1Y
- 52.22%
- 3Y*
- 325.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVI.L
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -16.81%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 43.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
3PLT.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVI.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L — Risk / Return Rank
3PLT.L
SLVI.L
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) and IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP (SLVI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3PLT.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3PLT.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 2.28 | -2.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between 3PLT.L and SLVI.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Dividend Comparison
3PLT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVI.L IncomeShares Silver+ Yield ETP | 0.07% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3PLT.L drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than SLVI.L's maximum drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3PLT.L and SLVI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3PLT.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.89% | -37.77% | -62.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -83.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.92% | -31.59% | -53.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.57% | -8.07% | -76.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.51% | — | — |
Volatility
3PLT.L vs. SLVI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 3PLT.L | SLVI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 108.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 161.05% | 51.54% | +109.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 194.38% | 51.54% | +142.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 194.38% | 51.54% | +142.84% |