3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L
3XFE.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR) and 3BP.L (Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. 3XFE.L is actively managed, while 3BP.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3XFE.L returned 26.80%/yr vs -2.39%/yr for 3BP.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
3XFE.L is traded in EUR, while 3BP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3BP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3XFE.L achieves a -21.50% return, which is significantly lower than 3BP.L's 76.87% return.
3XFE.L
- 1D
- 9.07%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- -21.50%
- 6M
- -15.93%
- 1Y
- -13.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
3BP.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -16.49%
- YTD
- 76.87%
- 6M
- 38.85%
- 1Y
- 161.91%
- 3Y*
- -2.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- —
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3XFE.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR | -21.50% | -0.13% | 87.68% | 8.62% | -43.02% | 5.22% |
3BP.L Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX | 76.87% | 10.73% | -47.57% | -13.44% | 50.69% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3XFE.L and 3BP.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.17 |
The correlation between 3XFE.L and 3BP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
3XFE.L
3BP.L
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
3XFE.L
3BP.L
-
Technology
3XFE.L
3BP.L
-
Industrials
3XFE.L
3BP.L
-
Basic Materials
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Communication Services
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Energy
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
Healthcare
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Real Estate
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Utilities
3XFE.L
-
3BP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L — Risk / Return Rank
3XFE.L
3BP.L
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 3XFE.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 4.12 | -4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 11.42 | -12.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 3XFE.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 1.89 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.06 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3XFE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.97%, smaller than the maximum 3BP.L drawdown of -84.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3XFE.L and 3BP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3XFE.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.97% | -84.99% | +18.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.56% | -39.10% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.49% | -82.35% | +32.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.42% | -45.40% | +9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.56% | -42.92% | +7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.67% | 14.12% | +3.55% |
Volatility
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Long Financials ETP Securities EUR (3XFE.L) is 12.56%, while Leverage Shares 3x BP ETP GBX (3BP.L) has a volatility of 29.66%. This indicates that 3XFE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3XFE.L | 3BP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 29.66% | -17.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.51% | 74.48% | -42.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.29% | 85.26% | -42.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.33% | 90.72% | -36.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.33% | 91.08% | -36.75% |
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 3XFE.L and 3BP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
3XFE.L vs. 3BP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 3XFE.L nor 3BP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
3XFE.L and 3BP.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
3XFE.L and 3BP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
Find the right allocation for 3XFE.L and 3BP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer